Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception - Irfan Ajvazi.

Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception - Irfan Ajvazi.

Nietzsche and the Nietzschean Philosophy of Morality - Irfan Ajvazi.

Reading Lyotard The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge - Irfan Ajvazi.

Descartes’ Discourse on Method - Irfan Ajvazi.

Reading Derrida’s Grammatology - Irfan Ajvazi.

The foundation of every society is the result of an arbitrary act: one of its parts takes control over the rest and (re)makes the world in its own image. Any sort of tribal, theocratic, feudal, political dimension in the history of our civilisation has indeed shaped reality according to its peculiar needs and aims, by means of a system of thought that could justify its permanence in time. The creation of artificial needs requires a distorted perception of inherent threshold values; (...) otherwise, Debord says, we wouldn't be the well-oiled cogs we're expected to be in the machinery of the system. The list of our natural needs is indeed quite short: only a few biological functions and a couple of psychophysical drives to be satisfied when necessary, such as sex and sociality. As a matter of fact, it doesn't take much for a human being to survive. Modern society can't afford to accept the concept of 'strictly necessary' though, not after its very existence became anachronistic and even threatening to a world ruled by the market-a world that needs buyers and consumers in order to survive. What Debord clearly points out is indeed the fake sense of freedom in our choices, the great lie presiding over our lives as consumers-a surrogate freedom that was bestowed upon us as yet another commodity. Even our dirtiest excesses are fed their daily fix of filth by the market; as long as our kinks imply some sort of purchase, we'll always find an industry willing to satisfy them. a use of the commodity arises that is sufficient unto itself; what this means for the consumer is an outpouring of religious zeal in honor of the commodity's sovereign freedom. waves of enthusiasm for particular products, fueled and boosted by the communications media, are propagated with lightning speed. a film sparks a fashion craze, or a magazine launches a chain of clubs that in turn spins off a line of products. the sheer fad item perfectly expresses the fact that, as the mass of commodities becomes more and more absurd, absurdity becomes a commodity in its own right... The spectacle is the moment when the commodity has attained the total occupation of social life. Not only is the relation to the commodity visible but it is all one sees: the world one sees is its world. Modern economic production extends its dictatorship extensively and intensively. In the least industrialized places, its reign is already attested by a few star commodities and by the imperialist domination imposed by regions which are ahead in the development of productivity. In the advanced regions, social space is invaded by a continuous superimposition of geological layers of commodities. At this point in the \"second industrial revolution,\" alienated consumption becomes for the masses a duty supplementary to alienated production. (shrink)

Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus -Irfan Ajvazi.

The Philosophy of Ideology - Reading Althusser and Machiavelli Politically - Irfan Ajvazi.

Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason - Irfan Ajvazi.

Baudrillard’s Simulacra and Simulation - Irfan Ajvazi.

Deleuze's 'Difference and Repetition -Irfan Ajvazi.

Deleuze’s The Logic of Sense- Irfan Ajvazi.

Foucault’s Discipline and Punish- Irfan Ajvazi.

Freud‘s Id, Ego and Superego - Irfan Ajvazi.

Freud’s Interpretations of Dreams - Irfan Ajvazi.

Heidegger’s Being and Time - Irfan Ajvazi.

Heidegger’s Being and Time - Irfan Ajvazi.

Heidegger‘s What Is Metaphysics? - Irfan Ajvazi.

Heidegger‘s What Is Metaphysics? - Irfan Ajvazi.

Ranciere's Aisthesis: Scenes from the Aesthetic Regime of Art -Irfan Ajvazi.

Reading Derrida Margins of Philosophy - Irfan Ajvazi.

Reading Deleuze's Proust and Signs -Irfan Ajvazi.

Reading Hegel‘s Science of Logic - Irfan Ajvazi.

Reading Ranciere's The Ignorant Schoolmaster - Irfan Ajvazi .

Rancière’s The Emancipated Spectator - Irfan Ajvazi.

The Deconstruction of Philosophy : The Spectres of Jacques Derrida - Irfan Ajvazi.

Theory of Ideology and Historical Materialist Thoughts An Essay on Althusser and Lenin by Irfan Ajvazi.

The Philosophy of Hegel‘s Phenomenology of Spirit - Irfan Ajvazi.

The Philosophy of Hegel‘s Phenomenology of Spirit - Irfan Ajvazi.

The Relevance of Saramago‘s Novel Blindness - Irfan Ajvazi.

The Spectres of Hegel and Marx in the 21th Century -Irfan Ajvazi.

What Lacan and Freud Did See ? - Irfan Ajvazi.

The Philosophy of Parmenides: The Provocative Thinker.

Reading Todorov’s The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre - Irfan Ajvazi.

What is Schizoanalysis? (An Introduction to Gilles Deleuze & Felix Guattari) -Irfan Ajvazi.

The main idea of this allegory is the difference between people who simply experience their sensory experiences, and call that knowledge, and those who understand real knowledge by seeing the truth. The allegory actually digs into some deep philosophy, which is not surprising since it comes from Plato. Its main idea is the discussion of how humans perceive reality and if human existence has a higher truth. It explores the theme of belief versus knowledge. The Perception Plato theorizes that the (...) group of people tied up in the cave would assume that the shadows they see on the wall are reality. Plato's theory further states that the echoing sounds the prisoners hear are perceived as reality. This false reality is all that the people in the cave know. They have no true knowledge of the real world. However, they fully believe that what they see on the cave wall is reality, and even try to name the shadows they see passing by. Plato's cave allegory further proposes that one of the prisoners escapes or gains freedom from the cave. The freed prisoner moves toward the fire, which temporarily blinds him. As he gains his eyesight and moves into the real world, he gains a greater sense of reality. (shrink)

Latour does not seek any “hidden” reasons behind actions; there is not a dictionary or encyclopedia explaining the sources of the behaviors of the actors. No meta-language is in question. The analyst cannot address any invisible agency. If an agency is invisible, then it has no effect, therefore it is not an agency. If an analyst says: “No one mentions it. For Latour, agency is not limited to human beings, but objects should also be counted as agents which is one (...) of the most attractive aspect of actor-network theory. (shrink)

Husserl‘s Cartesian Meditations- Irfan Ajvazi.

Over time, the actions of mankind have been the victim of two vague labels, right and wrong. The criteria for these labels are not clearly defined, but they still seem to be the standard by which the actions of man are judged. There are some people that abide by a deontological view when it comes to judging the nature of actions; the deontological view holds that it is a person's intention that makes an action right or wrong. On the other (...) hand there is the teleological view which holds that it is the result of an action is what makes that act right or wrong. In this essay I will be dealing with utilitarianism, a philosophical principle that holds a teleological view when it comes the nature of actions. To solely discuss utilitarianism is much too broad of topic and must be broken down, so I will discuss specifically quantitative utilitarianism as presented by Jeremy Bentham. In this essay I will present the argument of Bentham supporting his respective form of utilitarianism and I will give my critique of this argument along the way. (shrink)

Heidegger’s Being and Time - Irfan Ajvazi.