Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. In defence of exploitation.Justin Schwartz - 1995 - Economics and Philosophy 11 (2):275--307.
    Roemer's attempt to undermine the normative reasons that Marxists have thought exploitation important (domination, alienation, and inequality) is vitiated by several crucial errors. First, Roemer ignores the dimension of freedom which is Marx's main concern and replaces it with an interest in justice, which Marx rejected. This leads him to misconstrue the nature of exploitation as Marx understands it. Second, his procedure for disconnecting these evils from exploitation, or denying their importance, involves the methodological assumption that exploitation must strictly imply (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Organismality grounds species collective responsibility.Davide Vecchi - 2020 - Rivista di Estetica 75:52-71.
    It is frequently claimed that our species is responsible for climate change, for a new impending mass extinction, for destabilising ecosystems dynamics etc. These claims might be interpreted literally as meaning that it is our species, not merely its constituent organisms, that is causing climate change, biodiversity loss and ecosystem upheaval. Such literal interpretation depends on what kind of answer is given to the general theoretical question concerning whether supra-organismal biological entities such as groups, populations and species can be morally (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Eric Alden Smith and Bruce winterhalder, eds., Evolutionary ecology and human behavior. Aldine de gruyter, new York, 1992. Pp. XV, 470, tables, boxes, figures, bibliography, author index, subject index. $59.95 (cloth), $29.95 (paper. [REVIEW]Andrew P. Vayda - 1995 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (2):219-249.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Teorías sustantivas de la responsabilidad extracontractual Y la relevancia de la metodología.Diego M. Papayannis - 2012 - Isonomía. Revista de Teoría y Filosofía Del Derecho 37:61-97.
    Tradicionalmente se ha entendido que la mejor teoría de la responsabilidad extracontractual es aquella que mejor explica los rasgos centrales de la práctica. En este sentido, los defensores de las teorías deontológicas, basadas en principios de justicia, han rechazado el poder explicativo del análisis económico del derecho. Han sostenido que no logra reconstruir la práctica dando sentido a sus conceptos centrales, ni al modo en que están relacionados. Por lo tanto, no puede explicar la pauta de inferencias que llevan a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark