Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. De-idealization by commentary: the case of financial valuation models.Ekaterina Svetlova - 2013 - Synthese 190 (2):321-337.
    Is there a unique way to de-idealize models? If not, how might the possible ways of reducing the distortion between models and reality differ from each other? Based on an empirical case study conducted in financial markets, this paper discusses how a popular valuation model (the Discounted Cash Flow model) idealizes reality and how the market participants de-idealize it in concrete market situations. In contrast to Cartwright's view that economic models are generally over-constrained, this paper suggests that valuation models are (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • The power‐of‐pull of economic sectors: A complex network analysis.Jianxi Luo - 2013 - Complexity 18 (5):37-47.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Totally Model-Free Learned Skillful Coping.Stuart E. Dreyfus - 2004 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 24 (3):182-187.
    The author proposes a neural-network-based explanation of how a brain might acquire intuitive expertise. The explanation is intended merely to be suggestive and lacks many complexities found in even lower animal brains. Yet significantly, even this simplified brain model is capable of explaining the acquisition of simple skills without developing articulable rules for behavior or a model of the skill domain or an explicit identification of which observables in the environment are necessary for skillful behavior. Furthermore, no memories of prior (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Character Perspective on Complexity System and Brain-Science and The Paradigm Shift of Moral Education. 박형빈 - 2017 - Journal of Ethics: The Korean Association of Ethics 1 (112):129-158.
    복잡계 이론은 새로운 사회 인식의 틀로서 완전한 질서와 무질서를 보이지 않고 수많은 요소들의 상호작용으로 형성된 특징들을 통칭한다. 복잡계에서는 개별 구성요소들의 속성보다 구성요소들의 상호작용에 더 관심을 갖는다. 도덕교육에서 복잡계에 주목하는 이유는 인격의 특성과 도덕적 행동이 이루어지는 과정이 창발, 되먹임구조, 자기조직화, 비선형, 카오스, 지향성, 관계지향 등의 복잡계적 속성을 갖기 때문이다. 인간의 사고와 행동은 주체들 간의 관계와 소통이 복잡하게 어우러진 현상이다. 복잡계로서의 인격 특성에 대한 이해를 기반으로 도덕교육 패러다임의 전환 방향을 제안할 수 있다. 첫째, 도덕수업에서 학생변인 특성, 맥락 특성 등을 고려하기 위한 학생 (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark