Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Shadow of Totalitarianism: Action, Judgment, and Evil in Politics.Javier Burdman - 2022 - SUNY Press.
    The Shadow of Totalitarianism develops a new way to think about the problem of evil in politics. Beginning with the commonplace idea that the rise of totalitarianism in the twentieth century marked the emergence of a new form of evil, Javier Burdman finds early seeds of thinking about this form in Immanuel Kant's moral philosophy. Far from being an isolated object of inquiry, evil, Burdman argues, has long shaped and been central to philosophical understandings of political action and judgment. Systematically (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The State of Sovereignty: Lessons From the Political Fictions of Modernity.Peter Gratton - 2012 - State University of New York Press.
    Considers the problems of sovereignty through the work of Rousseau, Arendt, Foucault, Agamben, and Derrida.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Hannah Arendt, evil, and political resistance.Gavin Rae - 2019 - History of the Human Sciences 32 (3):125-144.
    While Hannah Arendt claimed to have abandoned her early conception of radical evil for a banal one, recent scholarship has questioned that conclusion. This article contributes to the debate by arguing that her conceptual alteration is best understood by engaging with the structure of norms subtending each conception. From this, I develop a compatibilist understanding that accounts for Arendt’s movement from a radical to a banal conception of evil, by claiming that it was because she came to reject the foundationalism (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Is radical evil banal? Is banal evil radical?Paul Formosa - 2007 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (6):717-735.
    There has been much recent debate concerning how Hannah Arendt's concepts of radical evil and the banality of evil `fit together', if at all. I argue that the first of these concepts deals with a certain type of evil, in particular the evil that occurred in the Nazi death camps. The second deals with a certain type of perpetrator of evil, in particular the banal `nobody', Eichmann. As such, bar a localized incompatibility in regard to Arendt's early account of the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations