- The cancellability test for conversational implicatures.Julia Zakkou - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (12):e12552.details
|
|
Relevance differently affects the truth, acceptability, and probability evaluations of “and”, “but”, “therefore”, and “if–then”.Niels Skovgaard-Olsen, David Kellen, Hannes Krahl & Karl Christoph Klauer - 2017 - Thinking and Reasoning 23 (4):449-482.details
|
|
Implicatures in judicial opinions.Marat Shardimgaliev - 2019 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 32 (2):391-415.details
|
|
The Lying Test.Eliot Michaelson - 2016 - Mind and Language 31 (4):470-499.details
|
|
Courage, cowardice, and Maher’s misstep.Brent G. Kyle - 2017 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (4):565-587.details
|
|
Infelicitous Cancellation: The Explicit Cancellability Test for Conversational Implicature Revisited.Jonas Åkerman - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (3):1-10.details
|
|
Logical relations.Lloyd Humberstone - 2013 - Philosophical Perspectives 27 (1):175-230.details
|
|
Knowledge in and out of Contrast.Mikkel Gerken & James R. Beebe - 2014 - Noûs 50 (1):133-164.details
|
|
How to Do Things with Knowledge Ascriptions.Mikkel Gerken - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90 (1):223-234.details
|
|
I’m Here Now, But I Won’t Be Here When You Get This Message.Niall Connolly - 2017 - Dialectica 71 (4):603-622.details
|
|
Relativism, Disagreement and Testimony.Alexander Dinges - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (S1):497-519.details
|
|
Knowledge, intuition and implicature.Alexander Dinges - 2018 - Synthese 195 (6):2821-2843.details
|
|
Reasoning Studies. From Single Norms to Individual Differences.Niels Skovgaard-Olsen - 2022 - Dissertation, University of Freiburgdetails
|
|