Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Partial worlds and paradox.Elke Brendel - 1993 - Erkenntnis 39 (2):191 - 208.
    Since universal language systems are confronted with serious paradoxical consequences, a semantic approach is developed in whichpartial worlds form the ontological basis. This approach shares withsituation semantics the basic idea that statements always refer to certain partial worlds, and it agrees with the extensional and model-theoretic character ofpossible worlds semantics. Within the framework of the partial worlds conception a satisfactory solution to theLiar paradox can be formulated. In particular, one advantage of this approach over those theories that are based on (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Barber Paradox: On its Paradoxicality and its Relationship to Russell's Paradox.Jiri Raclavsky - 2014 - Prolegomena 13 (2):269-278.
    The Barber paradox is often introduced as a popular version of Russell’s paradox, though some experts have denied their similarity, evencalling the Barber paradox a pseudoparadox. In the first part of thepaper, I demonstrate mainly that in the standard (Quinean) defini-tion of a paradox the Barber paradox is a clear-cut example of a non-paradox. Despite some outward similarities, it differs radically fromRussell’s paradox. I also expose many other differences. In the secondpart of the paper, I examine a probable source of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Byzantine Liar.Stamatios Gerogiorgakis - 2009 - History and Philosophy of Logic 30 (4):313-330.
    An eleventh-century Greek text, in which a fourth-century patristic text is discussed, gives an outline of a solution to the Liar Paradox. The eleventh-century text is probably the first medieval treatment of the Liar. Long passages from both texts are translated in this article. The solution to the Liar Paradox, which they entail, is analysed and compared with the results of modern scholarship on several Latin solutions to this paradox. It is found to be a solution, which bears some analogies (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • When Curry met Abel.Manuel Eduardo Tapia-Navarro & Luis Estrada-González - 2020 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 28 (6):1233-1242.
    Based on his Inclosure Schema and the Principle of Uniform Solution (PUS), Priest has argued that Curry’s paradox belongs to a different family of paradoxes than the Liar. Pleitz (2015, The Logica Yearbook 2014, pp. 233–248) argued that Curry’s paradox shares the same structure as the other paradoxes and proposed a scheme of which the Inclosure Schema is a particular case and he criticizes Priest’s position by pointing out that applying the PUS implies the use of a paraconsistent logic that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Recent Truth Theories: A Case Study.Guillermo Rosado Haddock - 2001 - Global Philosophy 12 (1-2):87-115.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation