Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Germ-Line Enhancement of Humans and Nonhumans.J. Robert Loftis - 2005 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (1):57-76.
    : The current difference in attitude toward germ-line enhancement in humans and nonhumans is unjustified. Society should be more cautious in modifying the genes of nonhumans and more bold in thinking about modifying our own genome. I identify four classes of arguments pertaining to germ-line enhancement: safety arguments, justice arguments, trust arguments, and naturalness arguments. The first three types are compelling, but do not distinguish between human and nonhuman cases. The final class of argument would justify a distinction between human (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Books Received. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2001 - Ethics, Place and Environment 4 (3):291-293.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark