Switch to: References

Citations of:

Some investigations on mbC and mCi

In Cezar A. Mortari (ed.), Tópicos de lógicas não clássicas. NEL/UFSC. pp. 11-70 (2014)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Paraconsistent Logic: Consistency, Contradiction and Negation.Walter Carnielli & Marcelo Esteban Coniglio - 2016 - Basel, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. Edited by Marcelo Esteban Coniglio.
    This book is the first in the field of paraconsistency to offer a comprehensive overview of the subject, including connections to other logics and applications in information processing, linguistics, reasoning and argumentation, and philosophy of science. It is recommended reading for anyone interested in the question of reasoning and argumentation in the presence of contradictions, in semantics, in the paradoxes of set theory and in the puzzling properties of negation in logic programming. Paraconsistent logic comprises a major logical theory and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  • Rasiowa–Sikorski Deduction Systems with the Rule of Cut: A Case Study.Dorota Leszczyńska-Jasion, Mateusz Ignaszak & Szymon Chlebowski - 2019 - Studia Logica 107 (2):313-349.
    This paper presents Rasiowa–Sikorski deduction systems for logics \, \, \ and \. For each of the logics two systems are developed: an R–S system that can be supplemented with admissible cut rule, and a \-version of R–S system in which the non-admissible rule of cut is the only branching rule. The systems are presented in a Smullyan-like uniform notation, extended and adjusted to the aims of this paper. Completeness is proved by the use of abstract refutability properties which are (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • An Abductive Question-Answer System for the Minimal Logic of Formal Inconsistency $$\mathsf {mbC}$$ mbC.Szymon Chlebowski, Andrzej Gajda & Mariusz Urbański - 2021 - Studia Logica 110 (2):479-509.
    The aim in this paper is to define an Abductive Question-Answer System for the minimal logic of formal inconsistency \. As a proof-theoretical basis we employ the Socratic proofs method. The system produces abductive hypotheses; these are answers to abductive questions concerning derivability of formulas from sets of formulas. We integrated the generation of and the evaluation of hypotheses via constraints of consistency and significance being imposed on the system rules.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark