Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Is Gene Editing Harmless? Two Arguments for Gene Editing.Julian Savulescu & Marcos Alonso - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):23-28.
    … the decision to genome edit will almost certainly be identity affecting, as a couple (or individual) will usually make it before they have created any embryos and the process itself will, at the...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Nuclear Families: Mitochondrial Replacement Techniques and the Regulation of Parenthood.Catherine Mills - 2021 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 46 (3):507-527.
    Since mitochondrial replacement techniques were developed and clinically introduced in the United Kingdom, there has been much discussion of whether these lead to children borne of three parents. In the UK, the regulation of MRT has dealt with this by stipulating that egg donors for the purposes of MRT are not genetic parents even though they contribute mitochondrial DNA to offspring. In this paper, I examine the way that the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act in the UK manages the question (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • An Ethics-Informed, Comparative Analysis of Uterus Transplantation and Gestational Surrogacy for Uterine Factor Infertility in High-Income Countries.Jeffrey Kirby - 2021 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 18 (3):417-427.
    Interest in the future, clinical implementation of uterus transplantation for uterine factor infertility was recently boosted by the demonstration of proof-of-concept for deceased uterus donation/transplantation. The ethical dimensions of living and deceased uterus transplantation are explored and addressed in the paper through their comparison to the ethical elements of an existing, legal, assisted reproduction practice in some high-income countries, i.e., gestational surrogacy. A set of six ethics lenses is used in the comparative analysis: reproductive autonomy and rights, informed choice/consent, relevant (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • What It’s Like to Be Good.John Harris - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (3):293-305.
    In this issue of CQ we introduce a new feature, in which noted bioethicists are invited to reflect on vital current issues. Our first invitee, John Harris, will subsequently assume editorship of this section.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • Saving Elizabeth: Radical Control & the Puzzle of Authenticity.Jesse Gray - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 12 (1):24-26.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The use of human artificial gametes and the limits of reproductive freedom.Dustin Gooßens - 2020 - Bioethics 35 (1):72-78.
    ABSTRACT Recent developments in generating gametes via in vitro gametogenesis (IVG) from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and their successful use for reproductive purposes in animals strongly suggest that soon these methods could also be used in human reproduction. At least two questions emerge in this context: (a) if a legislator should permit their use and (b) if ethical claims emerge that support their provision, e.g., by public health care systems. This urges an ethical reflection of the new reproductive options (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations