Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Orthodox and Heterodox Economics in Recent Economic Methodology.D. Wade Hands - 2015 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 8 (1):61.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Influence of Felix Kaufmann’s Methodology on Harold Garfinkel’s Ethnomethodology.Martyn Hammersley - 2020 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 50 (1):23-44.
    This paper examines the “methodology,” or philosophy of social science, developed by Felix Kaufmann in the second quarter of the 20th century, with the aim of determining its influence on the early work of the sociologist Harold Garfinkel. Kaufmann’s two methodology books are discussed, one written before, the other after, his migration from Austria to the United States. It is argued that Garfinkel took over Kaufmann’s conception of scientific practice: as a set of procedural rules or methods that determine whether (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Book Review: Felix Kaufmann’s Theory and Method in the Social Sciences, by Robert S. Cohen and Ingeborg K. Helling, Eds. [REVIEW]Martyn Hammersley - 2017 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 47 (2):175-180.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Terence Hutchison and Frank Knight: A Reappraisal of Their 1940–1941 Exchange.John Hart - 2010 - Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (4):359-373.
    The person arguably most responsible for the view of Hutchison as the positivist who introduced positivism into economics was Frank Knight. I argue that Knight in 1940 failed to demonstrate that Hutchison was a positivist, at least in the narrow logical positivist sense of the term. By questioning Knight's charge, I aim to challenge the conventional wisdom that identifies?Hutchison? with?positivism?. The paper is then a first step in the argument that positivism, even in 1938, played only an inessential role in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Terence Hutchison and the Introduction of Popper's Falsifiability Criterion to Economics.John Hart - 2011 - Journal of Economic Methodology 18 (4):409-426.
    Hutchison's 1938 essay has been variously interpreted as introducing positivism, ultra-empiricism and Popperian falsificationism to economics. Yet his apparent inconsistency in maintaining all of these positions seems to have gone unnoticed in the literature. Previously I have criticized attempts to characterize Hutchison as a positivist or ultra-empiricist. In this article I argue that Klappholz and Agassi failed to support their claim that Hutchison introduced Popper's criterion to economics. That is, this paper deals with this specific question, rather than the wider (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Introduction.D. Wade Hands - 2009 - Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (3):287-291.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • An Unfinished Manuscript by Terence Hutchison.Roger E. Backhouse - 2009 - Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (3):293-296.
    An introduction to the last article on which Terence Hutchison worked, now published under the title,?A formative decade: methodological controversy in the 1930s?, explaining what is known about its writing, and a brief summary of such biographical information and information about his work as is necessary to understand its significance.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Methodology in Action.Roger E. Backhouse - 2010 - Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (1):3-15.
    This essay addresses the question, raised by Frank Hahn, of whether the study, by economists, of economic methodology is in practice beneficial. After considering what this statement could mean, and discussing the example of Lionel Robbins, it draws a number of conclusions: that methodological statements have unintended, context-dependent consequences, and that these may result from factors that should have nothing to do with economics.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark