Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Physicians’ legal knowledge of informed consent and confidentiality. A cross-sectional study.Maria Cristina Plaiasu, Dragos Ovidiu Alexandru & Codrut Andrei Nanu - 2022 - BMC Medical Ethics 23 (1):1-9.
    Background Only a few studies have been conducted to assess physicians’ knowledge of legal standards. Nevertheless, prior research has demonstrated a dearth of medical law knowledge. Our study explored physicians’ awareness of legal provisions concerning informed consent and confidentiality, which are essential components of the physician-patient relationship of trust. -/- Methods A cross-sectional study assessed attending physicians’ legal knowledge of informed consent and confidentiality regulations. The study was conducted in nine hospitals in Dolj County, Romania. Physicians were given a questionnaire (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Deontological Guilt and Moral Distress as Diametrically Opposite Phenomena: A Case Study of Three Clinicians.Y. Bokek-Cohen, I. Marey-Sarwan & M. Tarabeih - forthcoming - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry:1-11.
    Feelings of guilt are human emotions that may arise if a person committed an action that contradicts basic moral mores or failed to commit an action that is considered moral according to their ethical standards and values. Psychological scholarship distinguishes between altruistic guilt (AG) and deontological guilt (DG). AG results from having caused harm to an innocent victim, either by acting or failing to act, whereas DG is caused by violating a moral principle. Although physicians may be expected to experience (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Raising the Dead? Limits of CPR and Harms of Defensive Practices.George Skowronski, Ian Kerridge, Edwina Light, Gemma McErlean, Cameron Stewart, Anne Preisz & Linda Sheahan - 2022 - Hastings Center Report 52 (6):8-12.
    We describe the case of an eighty‐four‐year‐old man with disseminated lung cancer who had been receiving palliative care in the hospital and was found by nursing staff unresponsive, with clinically obvious signs of death, including rigor mortis. Because there was no documentation to the contrary, the nurses commenced cardiopulmonary resuscitation and called a code blue, resulting in resuscitative efforts that continued for around twenty minutes. In discussion with the hospital ethicist, senior nurses justified these actions, mainly citing disciplinary and medicolegal (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark