Switch to: References

Citations of:

Luther and Erasmus: Free will and salvation

Philadelphia,: Westminster Press (1969)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Ought but Cannot.Wayne Martin - 2009 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt2):103 - 128.
    I assess a series of arguments intended to show that 'ought' implies 'can'. Two are rooted in uses of 'ought' in contexts of deliberation and command. A third draws on the distinctive resources of deontic logic. I show that, in each case, the arguments leave scope for forms of infinite moral consciousness—forms of moral consciousness in which a moral obligation retains its authority even in the face of the conviction that the obligation is impossible to fulfil. In this respect the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Christian theism and the free will defence.David Basinger - 1980 - Sophia 19 (2):20-33.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • In praise of folly? Theology and the university.Gregory R. Peterson - 2008 - Zygon 43 (3):563-577.
    To suppose the possibility of dialogue between theology and science is to suppose that theology is an intellectually worthy partner to engage in dialogue with science. The status of theology as a discipline, however, remains contested, one sign of which is the absence of theology from the university. I argue that a healthy theology-science dialogue would benefit from the presence of theology as an academic discipline in the university. Theology and theologians would benefit from the much closer contact with university (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations