Switch to: References

Citations of:

Adorno and Heidegger: philosophical questions

Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press (2007)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. ‘What Is, Is More than It Is’: Adorno and Heidegger on the Priority of Possibility.Iain Macdonald - 2011 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (1):31-57.
    (2011). ‘What Is, Is More than It Is’: Adorno and Heidegger on the Priority of Possibility. International Journal of Philosophical Studies: Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 31-57. doi: 10.1080/09672559.2011.539357.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • (3 other versions)Theodor W. Adorno.Lambert Zuidervaart - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • On the Sources of Critique in Heidegger and Derrida.Matthias Fritsch - 2021 - Puncta. Journal of Critical Phenomenology 4 (2):63-88.
    Seeking to contribute to the recent emergence of critical phenomenology by clarifying the relation between ontology and ethics, this article offers a new account of the sources of normativity in the context of Heidegger’s critique of technological enframing (Gestell) and Derrida’s political philosophy. I distinguish three levels of normativity in Heidegger and show how moving between the levels permits the critical deployment of the affirmation (Zusage) in response to being’s address. On this view, not only are humans constitutively claimed by (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • (3 other versions)Theodor W. Adorno.L. Zuidevaart - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • A missed connection: Löwith and Adorno on progress.Victor Weisbrod - 2021 - Thesis Eleven 165 (1):20-36.
    Despite appearing side by side as keynote speakers at a congress in 1962 devoted to the question of progress, Löwith’s and Adorno’s accounts of progress have never been linked. This paper is an attempt to establish this missed connection, to reveal important connections, striking similarities, and a fundamental difference between these two eminent thinkers’ work on progress. For one, Löwith diagnoses the three main problems that Adorno attempts to solve with his dialectical account of progress. Moreover, each is sympathetic towards (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark