Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Apparent Failure of “Situational Analysis” to Take Hold and an Attempt at Revitalizing It.Alfonso Palacio-Vera - 2020 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 50 (5):444-464.
    “Situational Analysis” (SA) constitutes Popper’s methodological proposal for the social sciences. We argue that notwithstanding Popper’s claim that SA is an attempt to extend the methodology of neoclassical economics to the rest of the social sciences, the former is better interpreted as an extension of his view of the “method” of history to the “theoretical” social sciences. The reason is that, unlike neoclassical economics, Popper’s formulation of SA presupposes that social scientists exhibit a “more complete” view of the “logic of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • ‘Situational Analysis’ and Economics: an attempt at clarification.Alfonso Palacio-Vera - 2019 - Economics and Philosophy 35 (3):479-498.
    Popper’s ‘Situational Analysis’ (SA) constitutes his methodological proposal for the social sciences. We claim that the two hallmarks of SA are: (i) that scientists assume they possess a ‘wider’ view of the problem-situation than actors do, and (ii) use the model as an ideal ‘benchmark’ scenario to identify thedeviationof actors’ actual behaviour from the former. We argue that SA is not a generalization of the neoclassical theory of individual behaviour but captures instead the methodology adopted by modern behavioural economists. Last, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Popper’s ontology of situated human action.Allen Oakley - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (4):455-486.
    Popper's version of situational analysis, with its focus on the logic of situations and the rationality principle, fails to provide cogent explanations of the human decisions and actions underpinning social phenomena. It so fails because where he demanded objectivism and formalism in the social sciences, his substantive arguments lost contact with the psychological and subjectivist realities of the human realm. But Popper also devised some key elements of a social ontology. It is argued that although there are crucial gaps in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Testimony from a Popperian perspective.Antoni Diller - 2008 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (4):419-456.
    Currently, testimony is studied extensively in Anglo-American philosophy. However, most of this work is done from a justificationist perspective in which philosophers try to justify our reliance on testimony in some way. I agree with Popper that justificationism is radically mistaken. Thus, I construct an account of how we respond to testimony that in no way attempts to justify our reliance on it. This account is not a straightforward exegesis of Popper, as he never tackled testimony systematically. It makes use, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Book Review: Jon Elster Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007. 484 pp. $90.00 (cloth). [REVIEW]Andreas Pickel - 2010 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (1):178-185.
    (No abstract is available for this citation).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark