Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Nihilism Without Self-Contradiction.David Liggins - 2008 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 62:177-196.
    in Robin Le Poidevin (ed.) Being: Developments in Contemporary Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Peter van Inwagen claims that there are no tables or chairs. He also claims that sentences such as ‘There are chairs here’, which seem to imply their existence, are often true. This combination of views opens van Inwagen to a charge of self-contradiction. I explain the charge, and van Inwagen’s response to it, which involves the claim that sentences like ‘There are tables’ shift their truth-conditions between (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • An Argument for the Ontological Innocence of Mereology.Rohan French - 2016 - Erkenntnis 81 (4):683-704.
    In Parts of Classes David Lewis argued that mereology is ‘ontologically innocent’, mereological notions not incurring additional ontological commitments. Unfortunately, though, Lewis’s argument for this is not fully spelled out. Here we use some formal results concerning translations between formal languages to argue for the ontological innocence of mereology directly.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Van Inwagen's New Clothes.John Bigelow - 1994 - Dialogue 33 (2):297.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Nuevo Trabajo para una Teoría de los Universales.David Lewis - 2015 - Ideas Y Valores 64 (157):251-267.
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Particular–Universal Distinction: A Dogma of Metaphysics?Fraser MacBride - 2005 - Mind 114 (455):565-614.
    Is the assumption of a fundamental distinction between particulars and universals another unsupported dogma of metaphysics? F. P. Ramsey famously rejected the particular – universal distinction but neglected to consider the many different conceptions of the distinction that have been advanced. As a contribution to the piecemeal investigation of this issue three interrelated conceptions of the particular – universal distinction are examined: universals, by contrast to particulars, are unigrade; particulars are related to universals by an asymmetric tie of exemplification; universals (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  • ∈ : Formal Concepts in a Material World Truthmaking and Exemplification as Types of Determination.Philipp Keller - 2007 - Dissertation, University of Geneva
    In the first part, I consider different notions of determination, contrast and compare modal with non-modal accounts and then defend two a-modality theses concerning essence and supervenience. I argue, first, that essence is a a-modal notion, i.e. not usefully analysed in terms of metaphysical modality, and then, contra Kit Fine, that essential properties can be exemplified contingently. I argue, second, that supervenience is also an a-modal notion, and that it should be analysed in terms of constitution relations between properties. In (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Emergence for Nihilists.Richard L. J. Caves - 2018 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (1):2-28.
    I defend mereological nihilism, the view that there are no composite objects, against a challenge from ontological emergence, the view that some things have properties that are ‘something over and above’ the properties of their parts. As the nihilist does not believe in composite wholes, there is nothing in the nihilist's ontology to instantiate emergent properties – or so the challenge goes. However, I argue that some simples can collectively instantiate an emergent property, so the nihilist's ontology can in fact (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • God and the New Math.John Bigelow - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 84 (2-3):127 - 154.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • A Relation as the Unifier of States of Affairs.Bo Meinertsen - 2008 - Dialectica 62 (1):1–19.
    This paper is concerned with what I call the ‘problem of unity’ . This is the puzzle of how Armstrong‐like states of affairs are unified. The general approach is ‘relational internalism’: the unifier of such a state of affairs is a relation of some sort in it. A view commonly associated with relational internalism is that if such a relation satisfies a certain ‘naive’ expectation to a relation – that it is related to its relata – then Bradley's regress results. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • ‘Two Examiners Marked Six Scripts.’ Interpretations of Numerically Quantified Sentences.Martin Davies - 1989 - Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (3):293 - 323.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • A Modest Logic of Plurals.Alex Oliver & Timothy Smiley - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (3):317-348.
    We present a plural logic that is as expressively strong as it can be without sacrificing axiomatisability, axiomatise it, and use it to chart the expressive limits set by axiomatisability. To the standard apparatus of quantification using singular variables our object-language adds plural variables, a predicate expressing inclusion (is/are/is one of/are among), and a plural definite description operator. Axiomatisability demands that plural variables only occur free, but they have a surprisingly important role. Plural description is not eliminable in favour of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • The Logic and Meaning of Plurals. Part I.Byeong-Uk Yi - 2005 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 34 (5-6):459-506.
    Contemporary accounts of logic and language cannot give proper treatments of plural constructions of natural languages. They assume that plural constructions are redundant devices used to abbreviate singular constructions. This paper and its sequel, "The logic and meaning of plurals, II", aim to develop an account of logic and language that acknowledges limitations of singular constructions and recognizes plural constructions as their peers. To do so, the papers present natural accounts of the logic and meaning of plural constructions that result (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   53 citations  
  • Strategies for a Logic of Plurals.Alex Oliver & Timothy Smiley - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (204):289-306.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  • I. With Reference to the Roots∗.Christopher Peacocke - 1978 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 21 (1-4):105-120.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation