Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Purgatory Puzzles: Moral Perfection and the Parousia.James T. Turner - 2017 - Journal of Analytic Theology 5:197-219.
    My argument proceeds in two stages. In §I, I sum up the intuitions of a popular argument for 'satisfaction accounts' of Purgatory that I label, TAP. I then offer an argument, taken from a few standard orthodox Christian beliefs and one axiom of Christian theology, to so show that TAP is unsound. In the same section, I entertain some plausible responses to my argument that are prima facie consistent with these beliefs and axiom. I find these responses wanting. In §II, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • On the Nature of Human Persons and the Resurrection of the Body.Stewart Goetz - 2018 - Journal of Analytic Theology 6:300-312.
    In this paper, I respond to Joshua Mugg and James T. Turner, Jr's claim that the doctrine of the resurrection requires the numerical sameness of ante- and post-mortem bodies. I argue that they have not shown that Scripture teaches this view and, therefore, that animalism, as opposed to substance dualism, does not offer a superior explanation for the necessity of the resurrection.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Temple Theology, Holistic Eschatology, and the Imago Dei: An Analytic Prolegomenon. Turner Jr - 2018 - TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology 2 (1):95-114.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Problems of Life After Death.Thomas Charles Atkinson - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (10).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Can I Survive Without My Body? Undercutting the Modal Argument.Joshua Mugg - 2018 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 84 (1):71-92.
    Modal Arguments in the philosophy of mind purport to show that the body is not necessary for a human person’s existence. The key premise in these arguments are generally supported with thought experiments. I argue that Christians endorsing the Doctrine of the Resurrection have good reason to deny this key premise. Traditional Christianity affirms that eschatological human existence is an embodied existence in the very bodies we inhabited while alive. The raises the Resurrection Question: why would God go through the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark