Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Double-Facing Constitution.David Dyzenhaus, Thomas Poole & Jacco Bomhoff (eds.) - 2020 - Cambridge University Press.
    This collection explores some of the many ways in which constitutional orders engage with, and are shaped by, their exteriors. Constitutional and legal theory often marginalize 'foreign' elements, such as norms originating in other legal systems, the movement of individuals across borders, or the application of domestic law to foreign affairs. In The Double-Facing Constitution, these instances of boundary crossing lie at the heart of an alternative understanding of constitutions as permeable membranes, through which norms can and sometimes must travel. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Long Arc of Legality: Hobbes, Kelsen, Hart.David Dyzenhaus - 2021 - Cambridge University Press.
    The Long Arc of Legality breaks the current deadlock in philosophy of law between legal positivism and natural law by showing that any understanding of law as a matter of authority must account for the interaction of enacted law with fundamental principles of legality. This interaction conditions law's content so that officials have the moral resources to answer the legal subject's question, 'But, how can that be law for me?' David Dyzenhaus brings Thomas Hobbes and Hans Kelsen into a dialogue (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Force of Law Reaffirmed: Frederick Schauer Meets the Critics.Nicoletta Ladavac & Christoph Bezemek (eds.) - 2016 - Cham: Springer Verlag.
    This book examines the success of Frederick Schauer’s efforts to reclaim force as a core element of a general concept of law by approaching the issue from different legal traditions and distinct perspectives. In discussing Schauer’s main arguments, it contributes to answering the question whether force, sanctions and coercion should be regarded as necessary elements of the concept of law, and whether legal philosophy should be concerned at all with necessary or essential properties. While it was long assumed that legal (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Kelsen-Hart Debate: Hart’s Critique of Kelsen’s Legal Monism Reconsidered.Lars Vinx - 2016 - In D. A. Jeremy Telman (ed.), Hans Kelsen in America - Selective Affinities and the Mysteries of Academic Influence. Cham: Springer Verlag.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation