Switch to: References

Citations of:

Mill And Liberty

Journal of the History of Ideas 30 (January-March):47-68 (1969)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. James Fitzjames Stephen's other enemies: Catholicism and Positivism in Liberty, Equality, Fraternity and beyond.Gregory Conti - 2021 - History of European Ideas 47 (7):1109-1149.
    ABSTRACT As the most famous critic of John Stuart Mill, James Fitzjames Stephen has often been assumed to have been a religious conservative or even reactionary. In contrast to these assessments, this article shows that Stephen's most consistent enemies were what he took to be the two most significant religious forces of the modern world: Ultramontane Catholicism and Comtean Positivism. The article explores his objections to these two religious ideologies, which he saw as sharing certain harmful features. It then shows (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Self-Reform as Political Reform in the Writings of John Stuart Mill.Eldon J. Eisenach - 1989 - Utilitas 1 (2):242-258.
    Students of Mill's political theory know that he was both a political reformer and a social philosopher. An important part of Mill's life involved political struggles over the electoral franchise and schemes of parliamentary representation, the legal and social emancipation of women, land law and economic policy, and freedom of speech and the press. When turning to his best known writings such asOn Liberty, Considerations on Representative Government, Principles of Political EconomyandThe Subjection of Women, issues of reform intrude at almost (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Tolerant Imperialism: J.S. Mill's Defense of British Rule in India.Mark Tunick - 2006 - Review of Politics 68 (4):586-611.
    Some critics of Mill understand him to advocate the forced assimilation of people he regards as uncivilized, and to defend toleration and the principle of liberty only for civilized people of the West. Examination of Mill’s social and political writings and practice while serving the British East India Company shows, instead, that Mill is a ‘tolerant imperialist’: Mill defends interference in India to promote the protection of legal rights, respect and toleration for conflicting viewpoints, and a commercial society that can (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations