Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Appropriating Resources: Land Claims, Law, and Illicit Business

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Business ethicists should examine ethical issues that impinge on the perimeters of their specialized studies (Byrne 2011). This article addresses one peripheral issue that cries out for such consideration: the international resource privilege (IRP). After explaining briefly what the IRP involves I argue that it is unethical and should not be supported in international law. My argument is based on others’ findings as to the consequences of current IRP transactions and of their ethically indefensible historical precedents. In particular I examine arguments from political philosophy for more equitable distribution of resources and appeals to property rights as a means of achieving this; business ethicists’ critiques of contemporary resource appropriations; and legal historians’ accounts of despoliation of aboriginal peoples, especially in what is now the United States, involving acquisition via conquest, asserted jurisdiction, and religious and racial preeminence. I also consider relevant human rights’ standards; supportive views of some theorists, especially early modern realists and current supporters of group rights and multidimensional rectification; some de facto incidences of substantive restitution; and proposals for effecting further rectification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. ‘Court TV Library: Miscellaneous Cases–Survivors of the Nazi Regime Sue Swiss Banks for Seized Assets’, 1999, available at http://www.courttv.com/legaldocs/misc/naziswiss.html. See also http://www.swissbankclaims.com.

References

  • Anton, A., Fisk, M., & Holmstrom, N. (Eds.). (2000). Not for sale: In defense of public goods. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banner, S. (2005). How the Indians lost their land: Law and power on the frontier. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banner, S. (2007). Possessing the Pacific: Land, settlers, and indigenous people from Australia to Alaska. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billing, S. (2004). Vieques, Puerto Rico: The social, environmental, and public health consequences of the US navy occupation. Prepared for Urban Studies 515, Spring 2004, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA. Available online at http://bss.sfsu.edu/raquelrp/projects/515_ej/vieques_puerto_rico.ppt. Accessed 10 April 2010.

  • Bird, F. (2009a). Why the responsible practice of business ethics calls for a due regard for history. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(Supplement 2), 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, F. (2009b). Project CARE: Placer dome’s efforts to help laid-off South African miners find remunerative work. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(Supplement 2), 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, W.: n.d., Beyond reparations. Social Science Research Network. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=515231.

  • Byrne, E. F. (1988). Building community into property. Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, E. F. (2011). Business ethics should study illicit businesses: To advance respect for human rights. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0885-y.

  • Churchill, W. (1996). From a native son: Selected essays on indigenism 1985–1995 (pp. 107–190). Boston, MA: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D. (2009). The failure of a socially responsive gold mining MNC in El Salvador: Ramifications of NGO mistrust. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(Supplement 2), 245–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, P.: n.d., John Locke on the possession of land: Native title vs. the “Principle” of Vacuum domicilium. Available online at http://arts.monash.edu.au/psi/news-and-events/apsa/refereed-papers/political-theory/corcoran.pdf. Accessed 3 December 2010.

  • Corlett, J. A. (2002). Wrongdoing, reparations, and native Americans. In R. C. Roberts (Ed.), Injustice and rectification (pp. 147–164, 186–191). New York: Peter Lang; orig. 2001.

  • Coughlin, D., & Ives, K. (2011). WikiLeaks Haiti: The PetroCaribe Files. The Nation (June 1). Available online at http://www.thenation.com/article/161056/wikileaks-haiti-petrocaribe-files.

  • Cowan, T., & Feder, J. (2010). The Pigford cases: USDA settlement of discrimination suits by black farmers. U.S. Congressional Research Service. Available online at http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/assets/crs/RS20430.pdf.

  • Daye, R. (2009). Poverty, race relations, and the practices of international business: A study of Fiji. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(Supplement 2), 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, A. (2000). Democracy in America (G. Lawrence, Trans., J. P. Mayer, Ed.). New York: HarperCollins Perennial Classics; orig. 1833.

  • Fahrenthold, D. A. (2009). Government to settle suit over Indian land trusts. Washington Post, December 9.

  • Gordon, M. (2011). Landmark Rio deal to deliver billions to Aborigines. Available online at http://www.theage.com.au/national/landmark-rio-deal-to-deliver-billions-to-aborigines-20110602-1fiwq.html.

  • Graham, L. (2009). Trade trumps basic human rights? Why the United States should endorse the UN declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples. Available online at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1515932.

  • Hailwood, S. A. (2001). Why “business’s nastier friends” should not be libertarian. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(1), 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herstein, O. J. (2008). Historic injustice and the non-identity problem: The limitations of the subsequent-wrong solution and towards a new solution. Law and Philosophy, 27(5), 505–531. Available online at SSRN, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1113928.

  • Herstein, O. J. (2009). Historic injustice group membership and harm to individuals: Defending claims for historic justice from the non-identity problem. Harvard BlackLetter Law Journal, 25, 229–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1968). Leviathan (C. B. MacPherson, Ed.). Baltimore, MD: Penguin Pelican; orig. 1651.

  • Hume, D. (1960). Of the original social contract. In E. Barker (Ed.), Social contract. London: Oxford University Press; orig. 1748

  • Idahosa, P. (2002). Business ethics and development in conflict (zones): The case of Talisman Oil. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(3), 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idemudia, U. (2009). Oil extraction and poverty reduction in the Niger Delta: A critical examination of partnership initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(Supplement 1), 91–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar, A. (Ed.). (2010). Thomas Pogge and his critics. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavka, G. (1982). The paradox of future individuals. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 11(2), 93–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazmin, A. (2010). India’s tribes pitted against corporations over land. Financial Times, 10 March, p. 3.

  • Kemp, D., Owen, J. R., Gotzmann, N., & Bond, C. J. (2011). Just relations and company-community conflict in mining. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(1), 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleingeld, P. (2007). Kant’s second thoughts on race. The Philosophical Quarterly, 57(229), 573–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korman, S. (1996). The right of conquest: The acquisition of territory by force in international law and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (Ed.). (1995a). The rights of minority cultures. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (1995b). Multicultural citizenship. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leith, D. (2003). The politics of power: Freeport in Suharto’s Indonesia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litan, R. E. (1977). On rectification in Nozick’s minimal state. Political Theory, 5(2), 233–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1960). An essay concerning the true original, extent and end of civil government. In E. Barker (Ed.) Social contract. London: Oxford University Press; orig. 1764.

  • Lyons, D. (1977). The new Indian claims and original rights to land. Social Theory and Practice, 4(3), 249–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, L. (2003). Intergenerational justice. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, rev. 2008. Available online at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-intergenerational. Accessed 2 December 2010.

  • Mills, C. W. (1997). The racial contract. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (2008). The domination contract. In D. I. O’Neill, M. L. Shanley, & I. M. Young (Eds.), Illusion of consent: Engaging with Carole Pateman (pp. 49–74). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffett, M. (2008). Space invaders: Brazilian villagers launch protests of rocket base. Wall Street Journal, October 9, p. A1+.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthu, S. (2003). Enlightenment against empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Congress of American Indians (NCAI). (n.d.). Land-into-trust. Available online at http://legislativewww.ncai.org/Land-Into-Trust.57.0.html.

  • Newenham-Kahindi, A. M. (2011). A global mining corporation and local communities in the lake Victoria zone: The case of Barrick Gold multinational in Tanzania. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(2), 253–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, M. A., & Kuhlman, C. (2009). Why criminal culpability should follow the critical path: Reframing the theory of effective control. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 40, 3–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. (1988). The sexual contract. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, P. (2005). Historic injustice and the possibility of supersession. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 26(3), 255–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • People’s Decade of Human Rights Education (PDHRE). (n.d.). The human rights of indigenous peoples. Available online at http://www.pdhre.org/rights/indigenous.html.

  • Pogge, T. (2008). World poverty and human rights: Cosmopolitan responsibilities and reforms (2nd rev. edn.). Cambridge: Polity; 1st edn., 2002.

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999). The law of peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifai-Hasan, P. A. (2009). Development, power, and the mining industry in Papua: A study of freeport Indonesia. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(Supplement 2), 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, L. G. (2005). Conquest by law: How the discovery of America dispossessed indigenous peoples of their lands. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D. (2010). Zimbabwe’s accidental triumph. New York Times, 15, A27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, B. R. (2010). Secessions, coups and the international rule of law: Assessing the decline of the effective control doctrine. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 11, 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.-J. (1960). The social contract. In E. Barker (Ed.), Social contract. London: Oxford University Press. orig. 1762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampford, C., & Palmer, M. (2005). The theory of collective response. In M. Halperin, & M. Galic (Eds.), Protecting democracy: International responses (pp. 23–62). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sher, G. (1980). Ancient wrongs and modern rights. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10(1), 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sher, G. (2005). Transgenerational compensation. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 33(2), 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sollors, W. (1995). The idea of ethnicity. In W. T. Anderson (Ed.), The truth about (pp. 58–65). New York: Tarcher/Putnam Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapleton, J. (Ed.). (1995). Group rights: Perspectives since 1900. Bristol, UK: Thoemmes Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterba, J. P. (1996). Understanding evil: American slavery, the holocaust, and the conquest of the American Indians. Ethics, 106, 424–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiltz, A. (2010). Can conquest confer territorial rights? Paper presented at meeting of Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, 23 January. Available online at http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p364137_index.html.

  • Szablowski, D. (2002). Mining, displacement and the World Bank: A case analysis of Compania Minera Antimina’s operations in Peru. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(3), 247–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. M. (1992). Vessels of evil: American slavery and the holocaust. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. (2001). Historical injustice and reparation: Justifying claims of descendants. Ethics, 112(1), 114–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tully, J. (1994). Aboriginal property and western theory: Recovering a middle ground. Social Philosophy and Policy, 11, 153–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, J. (1992). Superseding historic injustice. Ethics, 103, 4–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, J. (1995). Minority cultures and the cosmopolitan alternative. In W. Kymlicka (Ed.), The rights of minority cultures (pp. 93–119). New York: Oxford University Press; orig. 1992.

  • Waligore, T. (2009). Cosmopolitan right, indigenous peoples, and the risks of cultural interaction. Public Reason, 11, 27–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenar, L. (1997). The concept of property and the takings clause. Columbia Law Review, 97, 1923–1946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenar, L. (1998). Original acquisition of private property. Mind, 107(428), 799–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenar, L. (2010). Realistic reform of international trade in resources. In A. M. Jaggar (Ed.), Thomas Pogge and his critics (pp. 123–150). Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, T. (2009). Indian land trust abuse and the woman who finally got US to pay up. Christian Science Monitor, December 10.

  • Yamamoto, E. K., Serrano, S. K., & Rodriguez, M. N. (2003). American racial justice on trial—again; African American reparations, human rights, and the war on terror. Michigan Law Review, 101, 1269–1337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1989). Polity and group difference: A critique of the ideal of universal citizenship. Ethics, 99, 250–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Special thanks to Anne Donchin, Ph.D., for her wise editorial and scholarly suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edmund F. Byrne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Byrne, E.F. Appropriating Resources: Land Claims, Law, and Illicit Business. J Bus Ethics 106, 453–466 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1010-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1010-y

Keywords

Navigation