Abstract
Shortly before G. E. Moore wrote down the formative for the early analytic philosophy lectures on Some Main Problems of Philosophy (1910–1911), he had become acquainted with two books which influenced his thought: (1) a book by Husserl's pupil August Messer and (2) a book by the Greifswald objectivist Dimitri Michaltschew. Central to Michaltschew's book was the concept of the “given”. In Part I, I argue that Moore elaborated his concept of sense-data in the wake of the Greifswald concept. Carnap did the same when he wrote his Aufbau, the only difference being that he spoke not of sense-data but of Erlebnisse. This means, I argue, that both Moore's sense-data and Carnap'sErlebnisse have little to do with either British empiricists or the neo-Kantians. In Part II, I try to ascertain what made early analytic philosophy different from all those philosophical groups and movements that either exercised influence on it, or were closely related to it: phenomenologists, Greifswald objectivists, Brentanists. For this purpose, I identify the sine qua non practices of the early analytic philosophers: exactness; acceptance of the propositional turn; descriptivism; objectivism. If one of these practices was not explored by a given philosophical school or group, in all probability, it was not truly analytic.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Baldwin, T.: 1990, G. E. Moore, London: Routledge.
Baldwin, T.: 1991, 'The Identity Theory of Truth', Mind 100, 35–52.
Bell, D.: 1999, 'The Revolution ofMoore and Russell: A Very British Coup?', in A. O'Hear (ed.), German Philosophy Since Kant, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 193–208.
Carnap, R.: 1924, 'Dreidimensionalität des Raumes und Kausalität', Annalen der Philosophie und philosophischen Kritik 4, 105–130.
Carnap, R.: 1928, Der logische Aufbau der Welt, Berlin: Weltkreis.
Cornelius, H.: 1903, Einleitung in die Philosophie, Leipzig: Teubner.
Dummett, M.: 1993, Origins of Analytical Philosophy, London: Duckworth.
Fite, W.: 1910, '[Review of] Philosophische Studien. Von D. Michaltschew', The Philosophical Review 19, 323–327.
Frege, G.: 1980, in B.F. McGuinness (ed.), Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence, H. Kall (trans.), Oxford: Blackwell.
Friedman, M.: 1999, Reconsidering Logical Positivism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gabriel, G.: 1989, 'Objektivität: Logik und Erkenntnistheorie bei Lotze und Frege', in R.H. Lotze, Logik, Drittes Buch. Vom Erkennen (Methodologie), Hg. von G. Gabriel, Hamburg: Meiner, pp. ix–xxvii.
Heyde, E.: 1967, 'Rehmke', in Paul Edwards (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, Vol. 7, London: Macmillan, pp. 102–104.
Künne, W.: 1991, 'The Nature of Acts:Moore on Husserl', in B. Hale (ed.), The Analytical Tradition, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 104–116.
Kusch, M.: 1995, Psychologism. A Case Study in the Sociology of Knowledge, London: Routledge.
Lehmann, G.: 1943, Die deutsche Philosophie der Gegenwart, Stuttgart: Kröner.
Messer, A.: 1908, Empfindung und Denken, Leipzig: Quelle & Meyer.
Michaltschew, D.: 1909, Philosophische Studien. Beiträge zur Kritik des modernen Psychologismus, mit einem Vorwort von J. Rehmke, Leipzig: Engelmann.
Michaltschew [Michalcev], D.: 1996, in A. Stojnev (ed.), Iz korespondencijata na Akademik Dimitar Michalcev [Selected Letters], Sofia: Drinov (in Bulgarian).
Milkov, N.M.: 1997, The Varieties of Understanding: English Philosophy Since 1898, 2 vols., Frankfurt a.M.-New York: Lang.
Milkov, N.M.: 2000, 'Lotze and the Early Cambridge Analytic Philosophy', Prima philosopha 13, 133–153.
Milkov, N.M.: 2001, 'The History of Russell's Concepts “Sense-Data” and “Knowledge by Acquaintance” ', Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 43, 221–231.
Moog, W.: 1922, Die deutsche Philosophie des 20. Jahrhunderts, Stuttgart: Enke.
Moore, G.E.: 1903, 'Review of F. Brentano, The Origin of the Knowledge of Right and Wrong', International Journal of Ethics 14, 115–123.
Moore, G.E.: 1905a, 'Review of H. Cornelius, Einleitung in die Philosophie', Mind 14, 244–253.
Moore, G.E.: 1905b, 'The Nature and Reality of Objects of Perception', in 1922, pp. 31–96.
Moore, G.E.: 1909/1910, 'The Subject Matter of Psychology', Proceedings of Aristotelian Society 10, 36–52.
Moore, G.E.: 1910, 'Review of A. Messer, Empfindung und Denken', Mind 19, 395–409.
Moore, G.E.: 1911, 'Review of D. Michaltschew, Philosophische Studien', Mind 20, 13–116.
Moore, G.E.: 1922, Philosophical Studies, London: Allen & Unwin.
Moore, G.E.: 1942, 'An Autobiography', in Paul Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, La Salle, IL: Open Court, pp. 3–39.
Moore, G.E.: 1953, Some Main Problems of Philosophy, London: Allen & Unwin.
Müller-Freienfeld, R.: 1923, Die Philosophie des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts in ihren Hauptströmungen, Berlin: Mittler.
Rehmke, J.: 1910, Philosophie als Grundwissenschaft, Frankfurt a.M.: Kesselring.
Richardson, A.: 1998, Carnap's Construction of the World: the “Aufbau” and the Emergence of Logical Empiricism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Russell, B.: 1912, The Problems of Philosophy, London: Williams and Norgate.
Russell, B.: 1983, in E.R. Eams (ed.), Theory of Knowledge: The 1913 Manuscript, London: Routledge.
Simons, P.: 1997, 'Review of Kush, Psychologism', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48, 439–443.
Smith, B. (ed.): 1982, Parts and Moments: Studies in Logic and Formal Ontology, München: Philosophia.
Spiegelberg, H.: 1979, 'Husserl in Englang: Facts and Lessons', The Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 1, 4–15.
White, A.: 1958, G. E. Moore: A Critical Review, Oxford: Blackwell.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Milkov, N. G. E. Moore and the Greifswald Objectivists on the given and the Beginning of Analytic Philosophy. Axiomathes 14, 361–379 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AXIO.0000024898.09109.06
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AXIO.0000024898.09109.06