Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:30:07.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Difficulty for Testing the Inner Sense Theory of Introspection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Michael Roche
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A common way of testing the inner sense theory of introspection exploits the possibility of damage to inner sense. Such damage is expected to lead to first-personal deficits/impairments of one kind or another. I raise various problems for this way of testing the theory. The main difficulty, I argue, stems from the existence of the method subserving confabulation.

Type
General Philosophy of Science
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 80 , Issue 5 , December 2013 , pp. 1019 - 1030
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

In writing this article, I have benefitted greatly from discussions with Sarah Paul, Lawrence Shapiro, and Danielle Wylie. Thanks also to the audiences at the Southern Society of Philosophy and Psychology (2011), the Society for Philosophy and Psychology (2011), and especially the Philosophy of Science Association (2012), where I presented various versions of this article. In each case, the ensuing discussion was very helpful.

References

Armstrong, David M. 1981. The Nature of Mind and Other Essays. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Brasil-Neto, Joaquim, Pascual-Leone, Alvaro, Valls-Sole, Josep, Cohen, Leonardo, and Halett, Mark. 1992. “Focal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Response Bias in a Forced Choice Task.” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 55:964–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, Peter. 2009. “How We Know Our Own Minds: The Relationship between Mindreading and Metacognition.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32:121–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carruthers, Peter 2011. The Opacity of Mind: An Integrative Theory of Self-Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., and Chaiken, Shelly. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Engelbert, Mark, and Carruthers, Peter. 2010. “Introspection.” WIREs Cognitive Science 1:245–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gazzaniga, Michael. 1995. “Consciousness and the Cerebral Hemisphere.” In The Cognitive Neurosciences, ed. Gazzaniga, Michael, 1391–1400. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin. 2006. Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Robert. 1995. “Simulation without Introspection or Inference from Me to You.” In Mental Simulation, ed. Davies, Martin and Stone, Tony, 53–67. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lycan, William G. 1996. Consciousness and Experience. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.Google Scholar
Nichols, Shaun, and Stich, Stephen. 2003. Mindreading: An Integrated Account of Pretense, Self-Awareness, and Understanding of Other Minds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, Richard, and Wilson, Timothy. 1977. “Telling More than We Can Know.” Psychological Review 84:231–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert. 1949/1949. The Concept of Mind. Repr. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wegner, David, and Wheatley, Thalia. 1999. “Apparent Mental Causation: Sources of the Experience of the Will.” American Psychologist 54:480–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiffen, Ben, and David, Anthony. 2009. “Metacognition, Mindreading, and Insight in Schizophrenia.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32:161–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953/1953. The Philosophical Investigations. Trans. M Anscombe, G. E.. Repr. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wright, Crispin. 1989. “Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy of Mind: Sensation, Privacy, and Intention.” Journal of Philosophy 86:622–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar