Skip to main content
Log in

The ontology of theoretical modelling: models as make-believe

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The descriptions and theoretical laws scientists write down when they model a system are often false of any real system. And yet we commonly talk as if there were objects that satisfy the scientists’ assumptions and as if we may learn about their properties. Many attempt to make sense of this by taking the scientists’ descriptions and theoretical laws to define abstract or fictional entities. In this paper, I propose an alternative account of theoretical modelling that draws upon Kendall Walton’s ‘make-believe’ theory of representation in art. I argue that this account allows us to understand theoretical modelling without positing any object of which scientists’ modelling assumptions are true.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barberousse, A. (2006). Images of theoretical models. Unpublished paper delivered at A.P.A. Mini-Conference on Scientific Images.

  • Barberousse A., Ludwig P. (2000) Les modèles comme fictions. Philosophie 68: 16–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright N. (1983) How the laws of physics lie. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, A. (1998). Fictionalism. In E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved 5 Dec 2007, from http://www.rep.routledge.com/article/Q035.

  • Frigg R. (2006) Scientific models. In: Sarkar S., Pfeifer J. (eds) The philosophy of science: An encyclopedia, with Stephan Hartmann. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Frigg, R. (2009). Models and fiction. Synthese. doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9505-0.

  • Giere R. (1988) Explaining science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere R. (1999) Science without laws. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere R. (2004) How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science 71: S742–S752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith P. (2006) The strategy of model-based science. Biology and Philosophy 21: 725–740

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan M., Morrison M. (1999) Models as mediators. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, B. (1994). Dracula. (Penguin Popular Classics, 1st ed. 1897).

  • Thomson-Jones, M. (2007). Missing systems and the face value practice. Retrievable from http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00003519.

  • Thomson-Jones, M. (2009). Missing systems and the face value practice. Synthese.

  • Toon, A. (forthcoming). Models as make-believe. In R. Frigg & M. Hunter (Eds.), Beyond mimesis and convention: Representation in art and science. Springer-Verlag.

  • Toon, A. (2008). Models as make-believe. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.

  • Walton K. (1990) Mimesis as make-believe. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, H. G. (2005). The war of the worlds (1st ed. 1898). London: Penguin.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Toon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toon, A. The ontology of theoretical modelling: models as make-believe. Synthese 172, 301 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9508-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9508-x

Keywords

Navigation