Skip to main content
Log in

Externalism, proper inferentiality and sensible evidentialism

  • Published:
Topoi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alston, Williams: 1983, ‘Christian experience and Christian belief’, in Alvin Plantinga and Nicholas Wolterstorff (eds.),Faith and Rationality: Reason and Belief in God, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, pp. 103–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, William: 1988a, ‘Religious diversity and perceptual knowledge of God’,Faith and Philosophy 5, 433–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, William: 1988b, ‘The perception of God’, in Michael Beaty and Richard Lee (eds.),Philosophical Topics 16, Fall 1988, 23–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, William: 1991,Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, William: 1993a, ‘On knowing that we know: the application to religious knowledge’, in C. Stephen Evans and Merold Westfal (eds.),Christian Perspectives on Religious Knowledge, Eerdmans, Grand Rapid, Michigan, pp. 15–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, William: 1993b, ‘Epistemic desiderata’,Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LIII, 527–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audi, Robert: 1986, ‘Direct justification, evidential dependence, and theistic belief’, in Robert Audi and William J. Wainwright (eds.),Rationality, Religious Belief, and Moral Commitment, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp. 139–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Kelly James: 1990,Return to Reason: A Critique of Enlightenment Evidentialism and a Defense of Reason and Belief in God, Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Kelly James, ed.: 1992,Our Knowledge of God, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, David James: 1983,The River Why, Sierra Club Books, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, Mylan Jr.: 1992, ‘Personal and doxastic justification in epistemology’,Philosophical Studies 67: 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. Stephen: 1990, ‘Apologetics in a new key: relieving protestant anxieties over natural theology’, in William L. Craig and Mark S. McLeod (eds.),The Logic of Rational Theism, Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston, N.Y., pp. 66–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. Stephen, and Westphal, Merold, ed.: 1993,Christian Perspectives on Religious Knowledge, Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasker, William: 1986, ‘On justifying the Christian practice’,The New Scholasticism 60, 139–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoitenga, Dewey: 1991,Faith and Reason from Plato to Plantinga: An Introduction to Reformed Epistemology, SUNY Press, Albany, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konyndyk, Kenneth: 1986, ‘Faith and evidentialism’, in Robert Audi and William J. Wainwright (eds.),Rationality, Religious Belief, and Moral Commitment, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp. 82–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretzmann, Norman: 1992, ‘Evidence against evidentialism’, in Kelly James Clark (ed.),Our Knowledge of God, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 17–38.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mavrodes, George: 1983, ‘Jerusalem and Athens revisited’, in Alvin Plantinga and Nicholas Wolterstorff (eds.),Faith and Rationality: Reason and Belief in God, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, pp. 192–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Basil: 1973,The Justification of Religious Belief, Seabury, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, George S.: 1979, ‘Basing relations’, in George Pappas (ed.),Justification and Knowledge, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 51–63.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. Z.: 1988,Faith After Foundationalism, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, Alvin: 1983, ‘Reason and belief in God’, in Alvin Plantinga and Nicholas Wolterstorff (eds.),Faith and Rationality, University of Notre Dam Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, pp. 16–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, Alvin: 1986, ‘Coherentism and the evidentialist objection to belief in God’, in Robert Audi and William J. Wainwright (ed.),Rationality, Religious Belief, and Moral Commitment, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp. 109–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, Alvin: 1991, ‘The prospects for natural theology’, in James E. Tomberlin (ed.),Philosophical Perspectives 5: Philosophy of Religion, 1991, Ridgeview Publishing, Atascadero, California, pp. 287–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, Alvin: 1993a,Warrant: The Current Debate, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, Alvin: 1993b,Warrant and Proper Function, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, Alvin: (forthcoming),Warranted Christian Belief, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • Pojman, Louis: 1987, ‘Can religious belief be rational?’, in Louis P. Pojman (ed.),Philosophy of Religion: An Anthology, Wadsworth, Belmont, California, pp. 480–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Philip L.: 1991, ‘Epistemic parity and religious argument’, in James E. Tomberlin (ed.),Philosophical Perspectives 5: Philosophy of Religion, 1991, Ridgeview Publishing, Atascadero, California, pp. 317–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe, Elizabeth S., and White, Carol J., eds.: 1993,Faith and Practice: Essays on Justifying Religious Belief, Open Court, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, Thomas: 1970,An Inquiry into the Human Mind, ed. Timothy J. Duggan, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, David: 1994, ‘Engel on internalism and externalism in epistemology’, forthcoming.

  • Sennett, James: 1993, ‘Reformed epistemology and epistemic duty’, in Elizabeth S. Radcliffe and Carol J. White (eds.),Faith and Practice: Essays on Justifying Religious Belief, Open Court, Chicago, pp. 196–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinburne, Richard: 1979,The Existence of God, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Clifford: 1994, ‘Kierkegaardian suspicion and properly basic beliefs’,Religious Studies 30, 261–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolterstorff, Nicholas: 1983, ‘Can belief in God be rational if it has no foundations?’, in Alvin Plantinga and Nicholas Wolterstorff (eds.),Faith and Rationality: Reason and Belief in God, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, pp. 135–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolterstorff, Nicholas: 1986, ‘The migration of the theistic arguments: from natural theology to evidentialist apologetics’, in Robert Audi and William J. Wainwright (eds.),Rationality, Religious Belief, and Moral Commitment, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp. 38–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolterstorff, Nicholas: 1987,Lament for a Son, Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolterstorff, Nicholas: 1988, ‘Once more: evidentialism — this time, social’, in Michael Beaty and Richard Lee (eds.),Philosophical Topics 16, Fall 1988, 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolterstorff, Nicholas: 1992, ‘What reformed epistemology is not’,Perspectives 7, November, 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wykstra, Stephen J.: 1989, ‘Toward a sensible evidentialism: on the notion of “Needing Evidence”’, in William L. Rowe and William J. Wainwright (eds.),Philosophy of Religion: Selected Readings, second edition, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, pp. 426–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wykstra, Stephen J.: 1990, ‘Reasons, redemptions and realism: the axiological roots of rationality in science and religion’, in Michael D. Beaty (ed.),Christian Theism and the Problems of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, pp. 118–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagzebski, Linda, ed.: 1993,Rational Faith: Catholic Responses to Reformed Epistemology, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I wish to thank both Calvin College and the Centre for the Philosophy of Religion at the University of Notre Dame for funding a sabbatical year during which many of the ideas in this paper were incubated and drafted. During this sabbatical I read John Henry Newman'sEssay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent, and some of Newman's ideas no doubt rubbed off on what follows. For helpful comments on the paper, I am grateful to Alvin Plantinga, Fred Suppe, Paul Draper, James Sennett, Scott Davison, Stephen Evans, and numerous colloquia participants both at Notre Dame and Calvin College.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wykstra, S.J. Externalism, proper inferentiality and sensible evidentialism. Topoi 14, 107–121 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00769717

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00769717

Keywords

Navigation