The impossibility of reliably determining the authenticity of desires: implications for informed consent

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (1):43-50 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is sometimes argued that autonomous decision-making requires that the decision-maker’s desires are authentic, i.e., “genuine,” “truly her own,” “not out of character,” or similar. In this article, it is argued that a method to reliably determine the authenticity (or inauthenticity) of a desire cannot be developed. A taxonomy of characteristics displayed by different theories of authenticity is introduced and applied to evaluate such theories categorically, in contrast to the prior approach of treating them individually. The conclusion is drawn that, in practice, the authenticity of desires cannot be reliably determined. It is suggested that authenticity should therefore not be employed in informed consent practices in healthcare.

Author's Profile

Jesper Ahlin Marceta
No Longer In Academia

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-06-10

Downloads
279 (#50,776)

6 months
65 (#58,390)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?