Limited Epistocracy and Political Inclusion

Episteme:1-21 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper I defend a form of epistocracy I call limited epistocracy— rule by institutions housing expertise in non-political areas that become politically relevant. This kind of limited epistocracy, I argue, isn’t a far-off fiction. With increasing frequency, governments are outsourcing political power to expert institutions to solve urgent, multidimensional problems because they outperform ordinary democratic decision-making. I consider the objection that limited epistocracy, while more effective than its competitors, lacks a fundamental intrinsic value that its competitors have; namely, political inclusion. After explaining this challenge, I suggest that limited epistocracies can be made compatible with robust political inclusion if specialized institutions are confined to issuing directives that give citizens multiple actionable options. I explain how this safeguards citizens’ inclusion through rational deliberation, choice, and contestation.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ANNLEA-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-01-25
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
An Epistemic Theory of Democracy.Goodin, Robert E. & Spiekermann, Kai

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-01-25

Total views
281 ( #10,317 of 39,588 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
63 ( #7,031 of 39,588 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.