Some comments on the begriffsschrift and natural language

Philosophical Papers 12 (2):32-38 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If the begriffsschrift from Frege does represent the logical form of natural language it either lacks a logical form itself, or its logical form is different to that of natural language. But Frege insists that his notation has a logical form. So the second disjunct holds. This suggests that Frege's notation will generate consequences different to those that can be derived with natural language, with its different logical form. For anyone looking for "a means of avoiding misunderstandings", as Frege does, this would be unpalatable, to say the least.

Author's Profile

Alan Schwerin
Rice University (PhD)

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
273 (#55,737)

6 months
84 (#47,007)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?