Kierkegaard’s case for the irrelevance of philosophy

Continental Philosophy Review 42 (2):221-248 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper provides an account of Kierkegaard’s central criticism of the Danish Hegelians. Contrary to recent scholarship, it is argued that this criticism has a substantive theoretical basis and is not merely personal or ad hominem in nature. In particular, Kierkegaard is seen as criticizing the Hegelians for endorsing an unacceptable form of intellectual elitism, one that gives them pride of place in the realm of religion by dint of their philosophical knowledge. A problem arises, however, because this criticism threatens to apply to Kierkegaard himself. It is shown that Kierkegaard manages to escape this problem by virtue of the humorous aspect of his work.

Author's Profile

Antony Aumann
Northern Michigan University

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-05-30

Downloads
967 (#12,908)

6 months
146 (#20,808)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?