Is realism really bad for you? A realistic response Neera K. Badhwar 25th november, 2007

Journal of Philosophy (No. 2):85-107. (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Someone who is reality-oriented and in touch with important features of her life is realistic. Realism has long been regarded as a hallmark of mental health and well-being, understood as happiness in an objectively worthy life. This view has also long invited the objection that ignorance can be bliss. Another objection, of recent vintage, comes from social psychology. Taylor and Brown claim that mildly deluded people are healthier and happier than highly realistic people. I argue against both objections that, properly understood, realism really is good for us. Being realistic can sometimes be disastrous, but being unrealistic is usually worse. Taylor and Brown’s interpretations of the empirical data are often unjustified, and their arguments weak or invalid.

Author's Profile

Neera K. Badhwar
University of Oklahoma

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-07-18

Downloads
130 (#78,021)

6 months
60 (#62,715)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?