Mutual epistemic dependence and the demographic divine hiddenness problem

Religious Studies 52 (3):375-394 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In his article ‘Divine hiddenness and the demographics of theism’ (Religious Studies, 42 (2006), 177–191) Stephen Maitzen develops a novel version of the atheistic argument from divine hiddenness according to which the lopsided distribution of theistic belief throughout the world’s populations is much more to be expected given naturalism than given theism. I try to meet Maitzen’s challenge by developing a theistic explanation for this lopsidedness. The explanation I offer appeals to various goods that are intimately connected with the human cognitive constitution, and in particular, with the way in which we depend upon social belief-forming practices for our acquisition of much of our knowledge about the world — features about us that God would value but that also make probable a lopsided distribution of theistic belief, or so I argue.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-03-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
What Is Trust?Simpson, Thomas W.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Divine Hiddenness: Part 2.Schellenberg, J. L.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
279 ( #16,085 of 50,212 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
62 ( #8,983 of 50,212 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.