Hegel and Aquinas on Self-Knowledge and Historicity

Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 68:125-134 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Hegelian and the Thomistic accounts of self-knowledge are solidly Aristotelian in their origins and motivations. In their conclusions and consequences, however, the two accounts exhibit significant differences. Hegel argues that genuine self-knowledge is necessarily social and historical, while Aquinas says nothing about history or society in his account of self-knowledge. The aim of this paper is not to decide the issue concerning historicity in favor of either Hegel or Aquinas. The aim here is rather to address a prior question: what are the systematic and philosophical reasons for the difference between the two thinkers? In order to articulate this difference between the two, we might begin by considering an underlying similarity: their common Aristotelian background.

Author's Profile

Michael Baur
Fordham University

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-01

Downloads
359 (#42,793)

6 months
87 (#42,270)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?