Who Holds the Moral High Ground?

Imprint Academic (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Meta-ethical attempts to define concepts such as ‘goodness’, ‘right and wrong’, ‘ought’ and ‘ought not’, have proved largely futile, even over-ambitious. Morality, it is argued, should therefore be directed primarily at the reduction of suffering, principally because the latter is more easily recognisable and accords with an objective view and requirements of the human condition. All traditional and contemporary perspectives are without suitable criteria for evaluating moral dilemmas and without such guidance we face the potent threat of sliding to a destructive moral nihilism. This book presents a possible set of defining characteristics for the foundation of future moral evaluations and engagements, taking into consideration that the historically maligned female gender may be better disposed to ethical leadership.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
9781845401030
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BECWHT-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-02-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-02-23

Total downloads
15 ( #35,159 of 37,118 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #20,808 of 37,118 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.