Problems in Epistemic Space

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
When a proposition might be the case, for all an agent knows, we can say that the proposition is epistemically possible for the agent. In the standard possible worlds framework, we analyze modal claims using quantification over possible worlds. It is natural to expect that something similar can be done for modal claims involving epistemic possibility. The main aim of this paper is to investigate the prospects of constructing a space of worlds—epistemic space—that allows us to model what is epistemically possible for ordinary, non-ideally rational agents like you and me. I will argue that the prospects look dim for successfully constructing such a space. In turn, this will make a case for the claim that we cannot use the standard possible worlds framework to model what is epistemically possible for ordinary agents
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2012-11-12
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Nature of Normativity.Ralph Wedgwood - 2007 - Oxford University Press.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A Dynamic Solution to the Problem of Logical Omniscience.Skipper, Mattias & Bjerring, Jens Christian

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
450 ( #6,237 of 40,678 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
79 ( #6,204 of 40,678 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.