Multiple Universes and Observation Selection Effects

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The fine-tuning argument can be used to support the Many Universe hypothesis. The Inverse Gambler’s Fallacy objection seeks to undercut the support for the Many Universe hypothesis. The objection is that although the evidence that there is life somewhere confirms Many Universes, the specific evidence that there is life in this universe does not. I will argue that the Inverse Gambler’s Fallacy is not committed by the fine-tuning argument. The key issue is the procedure by which the universe with life is selected for observation. Once we take account of the procedure, we find that the support for the Many Universe hypothesis remains.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BRATFA-4
Upload history
First archival date: 2011-01-25
Latest version: 1 (2012-10-02)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
1,353 ( #3,266 of 65,616 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #23,347 of 65,616 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.