Der Urteilsbegriff und Wissen aus zweiter Hand in der Ästhetik

Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 69 (4):619-632 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although the concept of judgment has been replaced by the concept of belief in many philosophical subdisciplines, it has retained its central role in aesthetics. This paper discusses the following explanation for this: In contrast to the concept of belief, the concept of judgment presupposes conscious and first-personal engagement with the object about which the judgment is being made, and this conscious and first-personal engagement with the object in question plays a more important role in aesthetics than in other domains.

Author's Profile

Jochen Briesen
Universität Konstanz

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-09-18

Downloads
274 (#55,975)

6 months
119 (#28,636)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?