The composition of reasons

Synthese 191 (5) (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
How do reasons combine? How is it that several reasons taken together can have a combined weight which exceeds the weight of any one alone? I propose an answer in mereological terms: reasons combine by composing a further, complex reason of which they are parts. Their combined weight is the weight of their combination. I develop a mereological framework, and use this to investigate some structural views about reasons. Two of these views I call “Atomism” and “Wholism”. Atomism is the view that atomic reasons are fundamental: all reasons reduce to atomic reasons. Wholism is the view that whole reasons are fundamental. I argue for Wholism, and against Atomism. I also consider whether reasons might be “context-sensitive”
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-04-24
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
I Ought, Therefore I Can.Vranas, Peter B. M.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
461 ( #5,572 of 39,657 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #20,358 of 39,657 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.