The varieties of impartiality, or, would an egalitarian endorse the veil?

Philosophical Studies (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Social contract theorists often take the ideal contract to be the agreement or bargain individuals would make in some privileged choice situation (i.e., an ‘original position’). Recently, experimental philosophers have explored this kind of decision-making in the lab. One rather robust finding is that the exact circumstances of choice significantly affect the kinds of social arrangements experimental subjects (almost) unanimously endorse. Yet prior work has largely ignored the question of which of the many competing descriptions of the original position subjects find most compelling. This paper aims to address this gap, exploring how attractive experimental subjects find various characterizations of these circumstances of choice. We find evidence suggesting that no one choice situation can fulfill the role that social contract theorists have hoped it would play. We also find that, contrary to what some prominent social contract theorists have expected, there is no robust relationship between an individual’s ranking of distributive principles and their ranking of various descriptions of the original position. In conclusion, we discuss the broader implications of these results for political philosophy.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-10-18
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Justice as Fairness: A Restatement.Rawls, John & Kelly, Erin
Are Philosophers Expert Intuiters?Weinberg, Jonathan M.; Gonnerman, Chad; Buckner, Cameron & Alexander, Joshua

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
304 ( #10,921 of 42,344 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
63 ( #9,612 of 42,344 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.