Benardete’s paradox and the logic of counterfactuals

Analysis 78 (1):22-34 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I consider a puzzling case presented by Jose Benardete, and by appeal to this case develop a paradox involving counterfactual conditionals. I then show that this paradox may be leveraged to argue for certain non-obvious claims concerning the logic of counterfactuals.

Author's Profile

Michael Caie
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-16

Downloads
744 (#18,008)

6 months
102 (#33,441)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?