The Ethical Concerns of the ANWR Decision

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
An analysis is made of the arguments of factions opposing exploration and development of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge using four lines of ethical reasoning. Positive externalities are delineated which appear to outweigh negative externalities. Arguments of preservationists are countered with facts showing evidence of compromise from industry. Where compromise between the opposing interest groups has been advocated and employed, collaboration rather than compromise, is encouraged.
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-08-20
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
70 ( #36,284 of 47,380 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #24,750 of 47,380 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.