(Un)just Deserts: The Dark Side of Moral Responsibility

Southwest Philosophy Review 30 (1):27-38 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
What would be the consequence of embracing skepticism about free will and/or desert-based moral responsibility? What if we came to disbelieve in moral responsibility? What would this mean for our interpersonal relationships, society, morality, meaning, and the law? What would it do to our standing as human beings? Would it cause nihilism and despair as some maintain? Or perhaps increase anti-social behavior as some recent studies have suggested (Vohs and Schooler 2008; Baumeister, Masicampo, and DeWall 2009)? Or would it rather have a humanizing effect on our practices and policies, freeing us from the negative effects of what Bruce Waller calls the “moral responsibility system” (2014, p. 4)? These questions are of profound pragmatic importance and should be of interest independent of the metaphysical debate over free will. As public proclamations of skepticism continue to rise, and as the mass media continues to run headlines announcing free will and moral responsibility are illusions, we need to ask what effects this will have on the general public and what the responsibility is of professionals.
Reprint years
2014
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CARUDT
Upload history
Archival date: 2014-11-23
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-11-23

Total views
1,251 ( #2,546 of 54,623 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
174 ( #2,591 of 54,623 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.