Negative Natural Theology and the Sinlessness, Incarnation, and Resurrection of Jesus

Philosophia Christi 16 (2):409-418 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We respond to Swinburne’s reply to our critique of his argument for the Resurrection by defending the relevance of our counterexamples to his claim that God does not permit grand deception. We reaffirm and clarify our charge that Swinburne ignores two crucial items of Negative Natural Theology (NNT)—that God has an exceptionally weak tendency to raise the dead and that even people with exemplary public records sometimes sin. We show, accordingly, that our total evidence makes it highly probable that Jesus was not sinless, incarnate, or resurrected and that God has permitted massive deception regarding these defining Christian dogmas.

Author's Profile

Carlos A. Colombetti
University of California, Irvine

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-12

Downloads
511 (#30,760)

6 months
116 (#29,542)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?