On defining bruxism

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 247:551-555 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a series of recent publications, orofacial researchers have debated the question of how ‘bruxism’ should be defined for the purposes of accurate diagnosis and reliable clinical research. Following the principles of realism-based ontology, we performed an analysis of the arguments involved. This revealed that the disagreements rested primarily on inconsistent use of terms, so that issues of ontology were thus obfuscated by shortfalls in terminology. In this paper, we demonstrate how bruxism terminology can be improved by paying attention to the relationships between (1) particulars and types, and (2) continuants and occurrents.

Author's Profile

Barry Smith
University at Buffalo

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-30

Downloads
323 (#46,971)

6 months
71 (#53,715)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?