Can the Berkeleyan Idealist Resist Spinozist Panpsychism?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
We argue that prevailing definitions of Berkeley’s idealism fail to rule out a nearby Spinozist rival view that we call ‘mind-body identity panpsychism.’ Since Berkeley certainly does not agree with Spinoza on this issue, we call for more care in defining Berkeley’s view. After we propose our own definition of Berkeley’s idealism, we survey two Berkeleyan strategies to block the mind-body identity panpsychist and establish his idealism. We argue that Berkeley should follow Leibniz and further develop his account of the mind’s unity. Unity—not activity—is the best way for Berkeley to establish his view at the expense of his panpsychist competitors.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CLACTB-5
Revision history
First archival date: 2019-10-29
Latest version: 2 (2019-11-22)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 42 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-10-29

Total views
85 ( #33,785 of 47,362 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
85 ( #7,412 of 47,362 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.