Methods Matter: Beating the Backward Clock

Logos and Episteme 8 (1):99-112 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In “Beat the (Backward) Clock,” we argued that John Williams and Neil Sinhababu’s Backward Clock Case fails to be a counterexample to Robert Nozick’s or Fred Dretske’s Theories of Knowledge. Williams’ reply to our paper, “There’s Nothing to Beat a Backward Clock: A Rejoinder to Adams, Barker and Clarke,” is a further attempt to defend their counterexample against a range of objections. In this paper, we argue that, despite the number and length of footnotes, Williams is still wrong.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
2069-0533
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CLAMMB
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-03-28
View other versions
Added to PP
2017-03-28

Downloads
273 (#29,219)

6 months
22 (#38,435)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?