Methods Matter: Beating the Backward Clock

Logos and Episteme 8 (1):99-112 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In “Beat the (Backward) Clock,” we argued that John Williams and Neil Sinhababu’s Backward Clock Case fails to be a counterexample to Robert Nozick’s or Fred Dretske’s Theories of Knowledge. Williams’ reply to our paper, “There’s Nothing to Beat a Backward Clock: A Rejoinder to Adams, Barker and Clarke,” is a further attempt to defend their counterexample against a range of objections. In this paper, we argue that, despite the number and length of footnotes, Williams is still wrong.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
2069-0533
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CLAMMB
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-03-28
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Conclusive Reasons.Dretske, Fred I.
The Backward Clock, Truth-Tracking, and Safety.Williams, John N. & Sinhababu, Neil
Beat the (Backward) Clock.Adams, Fred; Barker, John A. & Clarke, Murray

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-03-28

Total views
73 ( #28,347 of 40,685 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #27,335 of 40,685 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.