The Ethics-Mathematics Analogy

Philosophy Compass (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Ethics and mathematics have long invited comparisons. On the one hand, both ethical and mathematical propositions can appear to be knowable a priori, if knowable at all. On the other hand, mathematical propositions seem to admit of proof, and to enter into empirical scientific theories, in a way that ethical propositions do not. In this article, I discuss apparent similarities and differences between ethical (moral) and mathematical knowledge, realistically construed -- i.e., construed as independent of human mind and languages. I argue that some are are merely apparent, while others are of little consequence. There is a difference between the cases. But it is not an epistemological difference per se. The difference is that ethical knowledge, if it is practical, cannot fail to be objective in a sense that factual knowledge can. One upshot of the discussion is radicalization of Moore’s Open Question Argument. Another is that the concepts of realism and objectivity, which are widely identified, are actually in tension.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CLATEA-12
Revision history
First archival date: 2019-04-18
Latest version: 13 (2019-08-06)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Modal Security.Clarke‐Doane, Justin & Baras, Dan

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-04-18

Total views
244 ( #14,165 of 43,036 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
228 ( #1,622 of 43,036 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.