What makes a response to schoolroom wrongs permissible?

Theory and Research in Education 18 (1):23-39 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Howard’s moral fortification theory of criminal punishment lends itself to justifying correction for children in schools that is supportive. There are good reasons to include other students in the learning opportunity occasioned by doing right in response to wrong, which need not exploit the wrongdoing student as a mere means. Care ethics can facilitate restorative and problem-solving approaches to correction. However, there are overriding reasons against doing so when this stigmatises the wrongdoing student, since this inhibits their learning. Responses that avoidably stigmatise students impermissibly undermine both the developmental ethos of education, and students’ recognition and respect for each other as equals.

Author's Profile

Helen Brown Coverdale
University College London

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-09

Downloads
137 (#79,313)

6 months
68 (#60,028)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?