Moral Deference and Deference to an Epistemic Peer

Philosophical Quarterly 65 (261):605-625 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Deference to experts is normal in many areas of inquiry, but suspicious in morality. This is puzzling if one thinks that morality is relevantly like those other areas of inquiry. We argue that this suspiciousness can be explained in terms of the suspiciousness of deferring to an epistemic peer. We then argue that this explanation is preferable to others in the literature, and explore some metaethical implications of this result.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DAVMDA-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-11-22
View other versions
Added to PP
2015-07-14

Downloads
360 (#22,639)

6 months
24 (#35,751)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?