A note on eternity

Topoi 36 (4):685-692 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The timeless solution to the problem of divine foreknowledge and human freedom has many advantages. Still, the relationship between a timeless God and temporal beings is problematic in a number of ways. In this paper, we focus on the specific problems the timeless view has to deal with when certain assumptions on the metaphysics of time are taken on board. It is shown that on static conception of time God’s omniscience is easily accounted for, but human freedom is threatened, while a dynamic conception has no problems with human freedom, but, on this view, some truths seem not to be knowable by a timeless God. We propose Fragmentalism as a metaphysics of time in which the divine timeless knowledge of temporal events and human freedom can be reconciled.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DEFANO-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-09-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-09-17

Total views
57 ( #38,475 of 47,204 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
51 ( #15,414 of 47,204 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.