The division of labour in science: the tradeoff between specialisation and diversity

Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (1):37-51 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Economics is a typical resource for social epistemology and the division of labour is a common theme for economics. As such it should come as no surprise that the present paper turns to economics to formulate a view on the dynamics of scientific communities, with precursors such as Kitcher (1990), Goldman and Shaked (1991) and Hull (1988). But although the approach is similar to theirs, the view defended is different. Mäki (2005) points out that the lessons philosophers draw from economics can go either way depending on the model chosen. Thus, the aims of this paper are (1) to illustrate this flexibility by proposing an alternative model which assumes increasing returns to adoption in science rather than the decreasing returns present in the aforementioned contributions; and (2) to outline the implications of this view for scientific pluralism and institutional design.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DELTDO-3
Revision history
First archival date: 2013-08-12
Latest version: 2 (2014-10-25)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Cognition in the Wild.Hutchins, Edwin

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-02-20

Total views
222 ( #12,545 of 38,819 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #22,698 of 38,819 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.