An Argument for Uniqueness About Evidential Support

Philosophical Issues 26 (1):130-147 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
White, Christensen, and Feldman have recently endorsed uniqueness, the thesis that given the same total evidence, two rational subjects cannot hold different views. Kelly, Schoenfield, and Meacham argue that White and others have at best only supported the weaker, merely intrapersonal view that, given the total evidence, there are no two views which a single rational agent could take. Here, we give a new argument for uniqueness, an argument with deliberate focus on the interpersonal element of the thesis. Our argument is that the best explanation of the value of promoting rationality is an explanation that entails uniqueness.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DOGAAF
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-06-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
.Williamson, Timothy
Knowledge and its Limits.Williamson, Timothy
Truth.Horwich, Paul

View all 40 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Grit.Paul, Sarah & Morton, Jennifer
Uniqueness and Metaepistemology.Greco, Daniel & Hedden, Brian
The Uniqueness Thesis.Kopec, Matthew & Titelbaum, Michael G.

View all 26 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-10-22

Total views
234 ( #18,538 of 49,106 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
73 ( #8,056 of 49,106 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.