The Covid-19 Response in England: A Conditional, Comparative Argument for Compulsory Medical Intervention

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Would compulsory treatment or vaccination for Covid-19 be justified? In England, there would be significant legal barriers to it. However, we offer a conditional ethical argument in favour of allowing compulsory treatment and vaccination, drawing on an ethical comparison with external constraints—such as quarantine, isolation and ‘lockdown’—that have already been authorised to control the pandemic. We argue that, if the permissive English approach to external constraints for Covid-19 has been justified, then there is a case for a similarly permissive approach to compulsory medical interventions.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DOUTCR-4
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-07-19
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-07-19

Total views
109 ( #35,228 of 54,440 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
109 ( #4,843 of 54,440 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.